Some marketeers will be unaware of the origins of the term “Web 2.0”. Oh so briefly: When US web strategist Tim O’reilly (Oreilly Media) formed a planning group of big- brains to analyse the changes in internet usage, the output created the 1st coining of the “Web 2.0” phrase. They examined the changing face of portal strategies from 99-2001 when the large media sites Yahoo, MSN, Lycos other search engines and BBC strived to provide all things to all men online. Since then we’ve seen the rise of empowered consumers defining product choices in vast forum groups, the phenomenon of online voyeurism in blogging exponential popularity growth. Google’s Pay per Click (PPC) launch (their 1st revenue stream) combined with increasing market share of searches and the impact of this on traditional marketing media is also central to the Web 2.0 era. Oreilly media’s site has an extensive article for those interested.
No-one can criticise a client’s desire to keep up with changing ways in which people are using the internet but its worth acknowledging that successful UGC initiatives providing active interaction with a brand requires skilful planning and intuitive implementation – its anything but plug and play. I saw a client brief recently that defined Web 2.0 as being UGC and “the ability to design web pages with rounded corners” – not entirely correct.
So how do brands build a reputation for being Web 2.0 compliant?
Listen to your online customers. It sounds basic, but many clients do very little analysis on their site traffic. How do they interact with the brand? What level of passion do you customers have for your products? What are your customers doing online now? If a brand attempts to engage its audience through a UGC concept without due consideration for your audience, customers may regard the efforts as misguided and perhaps damaging to their brand perceptions.
The danger to brands negating the planning process can be seen on many websites (I’ll avoid pointing out any examples) that have a discussion forum void of any discussion.
Web 2.0 should perhaps be considered as finding gold dust through brand depth – you can’t demand it you have to earn it through searching for increased respect from your online customer base.
What does this mean for brand managers?
-Surrender some control of your brand to your customers.
- If you moderate your UGC, do so retrospectively (get out of hours cover off-shore)
- Consider asking and rewarding some loyal customers to also act as moderators in responding to negativity rather than removing it.
- Look laterally at the opportunity to invite people to UGC – If your consumer product interest levels are already high then its most likely happening already. The last 2 cars I have owned have both had full ‘nuts and bolts’ forum attention in over 3 online sources each – none of these resources were provided by either car manufacturer or by a dealer network.
Overall avoid knee-jerk reactions and take advice from customers, and people in-touch with your brand who have UGC experience then review your options.
If your online customer engagement opportunity is strong then growth of awareness can be enormous and “Web 2.0” can therefore have significant meaning to your brand.